Cost effective prevention
The cost-effectiveness of preventing type 2 diabetes or, more generally, of preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD) in people who are at high risk (such as those with diabetes) has been investigated. The results are highly encouraging. A recent study   1  concluded that lifestyle intervention was cost effective in all age groups and cost-saving in those aged 25-44 years. Metformin intervention, while cost effective in younger age groups, was not cost effective in those aged over 65 years.

In low-income countries preventing diabetes by means of lifestyle intervention is likely to be highly cost effective. Other methods to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in people at high risk are also attractive from the humanitarian and economic points of view. Another study   2  found that a number of population-based and person-based interventions to lower blood pressure would be cost effective in all regions of the world. Some of the results are shown in Table 1. Costs in international dollars (ID) per Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY) saved range from below ID200 in countries such as Egypt, Iraq, Pakistan and Yemen to around ID1,500 in the wealthier countries of Europe, North America and Australasia.

Table 1 | Cost-effectiveness of a combined preventive strategy by region*

Region

Cost (x106)

DALY-SAVED

Cost/DALY-saved

Example nations

 

ID

(x105)

ID

 

AFRICA        
High adult and child mortality

 733

 18

 400

Algeria, Nigeria, Ghana 

Very high adult and high child mortality

 543

 17

 320

Botswana, Eritrea, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania

THE AMERICAS        
Very low adult and child mortality

 12,783

 91

 1,410

Canada, Cuba, United States of America

Low adult and child mortality

 2,056

 58

 350

Argentina, Colombia, Mexico 

High adult and child mortality

 298

 5

 650

Bolivia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Haiti

EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN AND MIDDLE EAST        
Low adult and child mortality

 789

 21

 380

Iran, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia 

High adult and child mortality

 952

 52

 180

Egypt, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen

EUROPE        
Very low adult and child mortality

 15,474

 99

 1,570

Belgium, Denmark, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom 

Low adult and child mortality

 NA

 88

 310

Bulgaria, Poland, Turkey

High adult and low child mortality

 4,198

 176

 240

Estonia, Hungary, Russia, Ukraine 

SOUTH-EAST ASIA        
Low adult and child mortality

 733

 20

 360

Sri Lanka

High adult and child mortality

 2,994

 95

 310

Bangladesh, India

WESTERN PACIFIC        
Very low adult and child mortality

 NA

 42

 1,320

Australia, Japan, Singapore

Low adult and child mortality

 6,072

 158

388 

China, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Samoa

*Mean Expected Annual Costs (ID2000), Disability Adjusted Life Years saved, and Costs/DALY-saved for a combined programme of salt-reduction, mass media health education, and four-drug therapy for all citizens with CVD risk > 25%.

NA not available
Adapted from Murray et al, 2003   2 

As has been pointed out   3 , there is little direct (i.e. RCT) evidence that people at high risk selected specifically on the basis of other risk factors (those with a family history of diabetes, for example) can benefit from these (or other) interventions. Also, with the exception of the STOP-NIDDM trial   4 , none of the recent trials have directly demonstrated a reduction in risk of cardiovascular disease consequent upon the reduction in risk of transition to type 2 diabetes. (Although the Diabetes Prevention Program has demonstrated a reduction in surrogate risk factors   5 ). However, it could logically be argued that those with other risk factors should benefit and that cardiovascular risk should be reduced if the progression to diabetes can be delayed.

Additional to this possible benefit is that the early diagnosis of type 2 diabetes enables surveillance of the development of microvascular complications to be initiated and their treatment to be started if this is available and appropriate. If these preventive goals are realized, the potential health benefits, both to the individual and to society, are enormous. As a result, the global profile of diabetes would be transformed.


1.Herman,W.H. Hoerger,T.J. Brandle,M. Hicks,K. Sorensen,S. Zhang,P. Hamman,R.F. Ackermann,R.T. Engelgau,M.M. Ratner,R.E. The cost-effectiveness of lifestyle modification or metformin in preventing type 2 diabetes in adults with impaired glucose tolerance. Ann.Intern.Med..2005; 142(5): 323-332
2.Murray,C.J. Lauer,J.A. Hutubessy,R.C. Niessen,L. Tomijima,N. Rodgers,A. Lawes,C.M. Evans,D.B. Effectiveness and costs of interventions to lower systolic blood pressure and cholesterol: a global and regional analysis on reduction of cardiovascular-disease risk. Lancet..2003; 361(9359): 717-725
3.Tuomilehto,J. Modeling of primary prevention of the development of type 2 diabetes. Przegl.Lek..2006; 63 Suppl 4: 3-6
4.Chiasson,J.L. Josse,R.G. Gomis,R. Hanefeld,M. Karasik,A. Laakso,M. Acarbose treatment and the risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: the STOP-NIDDM trial. JAMA..2003; 290(4): 486-494
5.Ratner,R. Goldberg,R. Haffner,S. Marcovina,S. Orchard,T. Fowler,S. Temprosa,M. Impact of intensive lifestyle and metformin therapy on cardiovascular disease risk factors in the diabetes prevention program. Diabetes Care..2005; 28(4): 888-894